Nimble duck
JoinedPosts by Nimble duck
-
191
Evolution is a Fact - Index of Parts 1 - 40
by cofty in#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
-
191
Evolution is a Fact - Index of Parts 1 - 40
by cofty in#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
-
Nimble duck
Evolutionists have no explanation for how the first living organisms came into being. When pressed, they say "it's coming".
The fossil record demonstrates a complete lack of evidence for evolution.
All (100%) of the attempts by "scientists" to reproduce even the simplest proof have failed miserably.
All the evolutionists have is wordy sentences and hostility.
-
191
Evolution is a Fact - Index of Parts 1 - 40
by cofty in#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
-
Nimble duck
Ok. But that wasn't your argument. You said you are "baffled" that Cofty would turn a common "Bible belt" belief that "all mankind" comes from the common ancestor Adam and proceed to make it an evolutionary matter.
There is no evidence that man and beast came from he same soup.
That is the evolutionist premise, is it not, that since we both have bones and meat on them those bones, that we evolved...
-
191
Evolution is a Fact - Index of Parts 1 - 40
by cofty in#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
-
Nimble duck
Whoa! There he goes. Lit the fuse and boom.
Go on Cofty. Ram it down their throats.
-
191
Evolution is a Fact - Index of Parts 1 - 40
by cofty in#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
-
Nimble duck
Cofty, you keep contradicting yourself. It has been clearly noted that you have said over and over that the "proof" is still coming... yet to be found etc. Then you say "it is in".
Which is it? Stop contradicting yourself.
And by the way, it's all in type throughout the thread, so don't bother to tell us it isn't there. We can read.
-
191
Evolution is a Fact - Index of Parts 1 - 40
by cofty in#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
-
Nimble duck
Nimble duck: It's a foregone conclusion that it is accepted in the Bible Belt that we all descend from a common ancestor. How you have made this an issue, and made it supposed proof of evolution is breathtaking.
Each in its own species.
The day a scientist turns a dog into a cat, I will listen.
-
191
Evolution is a Fact - Index of Parts 1 - 40
by cofty in#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
-
Nimble duck
What I would be interested in hearing from NImble Duck et al is some detail on what (if anything) he does agree with and what he doesn't.
ND: You asked, so I will answer.
I've seen very little serious and specific counter-arguments to any of Cofty's posts.
ND: I have NOT tried to prove anything, so the oness is not on me to provide specific arguments. I have merely pointed out the gaping holes in the evolutionist position. I have merely asked for answers to the big questions. I have pointed out that evolutionists DO NOT follow the scientific method. They have no experiments, never mind repeatable ones, that provide a resultant in favor of evolution. They always say "soon we will have it" and state the unproven as fact. I have merely, and correctly objected to this unscientific nonsense.
Does Duck agree with the concept that an animal may adapt and evolve?
ND: This is a non sequiter. "Adapt" and "evolve" are completely different things. "Adapt" is to change within a set of defined parameters. "Evolve" is to develop entirely new parameters. To put these two entirely different things together is to confuse the issue.
Does he accept any evidence of evolution being observed?
ND. LOL what evidence?
Does he consider all gene mutations to be unable to produce positive and sustainable change?
ND: Where is the scientific proof that a gene mutation was ever beneficial?
Cofty has been clear that he considers the statement that "all living things descended from a common ancestor" is a fact. He has presented numerous lines of argument to back that up.
ND: Now, this one baffles me. This is a JW forum. Supposedly, everyone here comes from a Bible background. The Genesis account, that we all learned, speaks of all mankind coming from a common ancestor, Adam. It's a foregone conclusion that it is accepted in the Bible Belt that we all descend from a common ancestor. How you have made this an issue, and made it supposed proof of evolution is breathtaking.
Please write better stuff.
-
191
Evolution is a Fact - Index of Parts 1 - 40
by cofty in#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
-
Nimble duck
"One hundred million years ago, the first unicorn descended from the mountain top, probably with the tooth fairy on its back. Scientists are sure of this probably, and we will soon find proof. This makes it a fact."
Its in quotes. That makes it scientific.
Just gotta get it peer reviewed and rubber stamped by Bill Nye the science guy.
-
191
Evolution is a Fact - Index of Parts 1 - 40
by cofty in#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
-
Nimble duck
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17987-how-life-evolved-10-steps-to-the-first-cells/
Anyone who wants to read the material that the evolutionist mind feeds on, have a look. The first point assumes water without any attempt at explaining where the hell the water came from.
There's no scientific method followed, to demonstrate their 'repeatable' experiments and results. It's all just crap they printed neatly inside the borders.
-
191
Evolution is a Fact - Index of Parts 1 - 40
by cofty in#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
-
Nimble duck
I stated that evolution is a fact. I have never stated that any particular hypothesis regarding abiogenesis is a fact.
The origin of life PROBABLY began in alkaline hydrothermal vents. The answer may turn out to be elsewhere.Do you read what you write? For the love of unGod man, give it a try. "The answer MAY turn out to be"... you might fool the gullible with this kind of clap trap, but a thinking mind is in no danger with your nonsense. All your "proof" is still in the future, and you are a hangin' today.